注釋

[1]Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C., Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso, 2001.

[2]Bauman, Z., Liquid Times: Living in an Age of uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity, 2007; Lash, S. & Urry, J., The End of Organized Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Books, 1987; Bataille, G., The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy, Vol. I Consumption, New York: Zone Books, 1991, p. 28, 45-61; Bataille, G., "The Notion of Expenditure", Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985, pp. 118-122.

[3]"The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations", Schmitt, C., The Concept of the Political, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, pp. 80-96.

[4]Schmitt, C., The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. Kennedy Ellen, Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 1988, pp. 15-16.

[5]Schmitt, C., "The Legal World Revolution", Telos, 72, 1987, p. 88.

[6][23]Bataille, G., "The Psychological Structure of Fascism", in Georges Bataille Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985, pp. 137-160; p. 156.

[7]Thess. 2:6-7, New Revised Standard Version; Martin J.J., Menken, 2 Thessalonians, London: Routledge, 1994.

[8]Ostovich, S., "Carl Schmitt, Political Theology, and Eschatology" in KronoScope 7, 2007, p. 65; Hirst, P., "Carl Schmitt's Decisionism", The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, London: Verso, 1999, p. 14.

[9]Mouffe, C., "Introduction: Schmitt's Challenge", The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, London: Verso, 1999, pp. 4-5.

[10]Foucault, M., Society Must Be Defended: LECTURES AT THE COLLÈGE DE FRANCE, 1975-1976, Mauro Bertani and Alessandro Fontana (eds.), David Macey (trans.), New York: Picador, 2003, pp. 250-253；王慶豐：《資本論中的生命政治》，《哲學研究》，2018年第8期。

[11][18]Foucault, M., SECUIRTY, TERRITORY, POPULATION: LECTURES AT THE COLLÈGE DE FRANCE, 1977-1978, Michel Senellart (eds.), Graham Burchell (trans.), New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, pp. 276-277, 288-289; pp. 20-22.

[12]Boyne, R., Post-Panopticism, Economy and Society, 29:2, 2000, pp. 285-307.

[13]Meier, Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, The Concept of the Political, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003, p. 77.

[14]Baudrillard, J., Symbolic Exchange and Death, London: Sage, 1993, pp 6-38, 50.

[15]Thacker, E., "The Shadows of Atheology: Epidemics, Power and Life after Foucault", Theory, Culture & Society, 2009, Vol. 26(6): p. 135.

[16]張一兵：《生命政治學與現代權力治理術——福柯的法蘭西學院演講評述》，《天津社會科學》，2015年第1期；莫偉民：《福柯與自由主義：作為意識形態抑或治理技藝？》，《哲學研究》，2012年第10期。

[17]Collier, S. J., "Topologies of Power: Foucault's Analysis of Political Government beyond 'Governmentality'", Theory, Culture & Society, 2009, 26(6): p. 96; Gordon, C., "Governmental Rationality: An Introduction", in G., Burchell; C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991, p. 3.

[19]Foucault, M., "Alternatives to the Prison: Dissemination or Decline of Social Control?", Theory, Culture & Society, 2009, 26(6): pp. 12-24; Foucault, M., The Birth of Biopolitics: LECTURES AT THE COLLÈGE DE FRANCE, 1978-1979, Michel Senellart (eds.)., Graham Burchell (trans.), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 248-259.

[20]Davis, A. & Walsh, C., "Distinguishing Financialization from Neoliberalism", Theory, Culture & Society, 2017, Vol. 34: (5-6), pp. 29-34.

[21]G. Becker, "Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis", Journal of Political Economy, 1962, vol. 70 (5) 2nd part, pp. 9–49; G. Becker, "On the new Theory of Consumer Behavior", Swedish Journal of Economics, 1973, vol. 75, pp. 375–395; Schultz, T.W. "Investment in human capital", American Economic Review, 1961, vol. 51, pp. 1–17; Schultz, T.W. "Reflections on investment in man", Journal of Political Economy, 1962, vol. 70 (5) 2nd part, pp. 1–8.

[22]Graeber, D., Debt: The First 5,000 Years, New York: Melville House Publishing, 2011, p. 23, 372; Ingham, G., The Nature of Money, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004, pp. 89-133.

[24]Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F., Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London: Continuum, 2003, p. 31.

責 編／郭 丹

黃罡，廣州大學馬克思主義學院。

The Heterogeneity Dilemma of Western Mobility Governance

in the Post-9.11 Era

Huang Gang

Abstract: After the 9.11 incident and the 2008 financial crisis, the Western governance model based on mobility induced by financial capital has changed significantly. The enemy represented by resurging extreme fundamentalism has infiltrated into the Western society. The external anti-terrorism war and isolation strategy in the name of national security not only contradicts the principle of free market under the influence of Christian political theology and racism, but also becomes the security premise of internal governance. Internal governance is based on the (neo-) liberal turn of the late 1970s. On the one hand, it induces consumption due to personal desires and stimulates mobility through financialization; on the other hand, it puts social mobility under the normative control dominated by debt relationship, as well as under more covert behavior and information monitoring. The governance model constructed on the basis of both the war machine and financial devices not only indulges heterogeneity in the mobility and consumption, but also falls into the predicament of populism in the symbiotic relationship with fascism.

Keywords: governance, mobility, heterogeneity, Neo-liberalism, populism